Online Makale
Online Hizmetlere Toplu BakışTurkish Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Turk J Pharm Sci. 2016; 13(2): 17-32 | DOI: 10.5505/tjps.2016.29484 | |||
Association Between The 5-HTTLPR Polymorphism and Response to Citalopram in Turkish Patients With Major Depressive DisorderZuhal Uçkun1, Bora Başkak2, Hatice Özdemir3, Erguvan Tuğba Ozel-kızıl2, Halise Devrimci Ozguven2, Halit Sinan Süzen41Mersin University, Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Toxicology, Yenisehir Campus, TR33169, Mersin, TURKEY2Ankara University, School of Medicine, Psychiatry Department, TR06590, Dikimevi, Ankara, TURKEY 3Kirikkale University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Kirikkale, TURKEY, 4Ankara University, Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Toxicology, Tandogan, TR06100 Ankara, Turkey 4Ankara University, Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Toxicology, Tandogan, TR06100 Ankara, Turkey The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between the genetic polymorphism of the serotonin transporter gene-linked polymorphic region (5-HTTLPR)and the response to citalopram treatment and side effects in Turkish patients with major depressive disorder. The study involved 51 patients who received 10-40 mg/day of citalopram for 4 to 6 weeks. Clinical symptoms were evaluated by the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating (HAMD-17) scale, Clinical Global Impression (CGI) and UKU side effect rating scale (UKU) at weeks 4 and/or 6. The 5-HTTLPRL/S polymorphism was determined by slowdown-polymerase chain reaction method. Of the fifty-one patients, 13 (26%) were the LL genotype, 21 (41%) were the LS genotype, 17 (33%) were the SS genotype. L allele seems to be associated withbetter response due to odds ratio for L allele versus S allele despite statistically insignificant. In terms of CGI-Severity scale, The LL genotype versus the LS genotype had a higher risk at the week 6 (P<0.05).On the other hand, apart from this comparison, there is no significant difference in CGI-Severity and Improvement and UKU scales according to the distribution of genotypes at week 4 and/or 6. However, these findings surely need further investigation and confirmation. Keywords: 5-HTTLPR polymorphism, Citalopram, Treatment response, Side effects.Association Between The 5-HTTLPR Polymorphism and Response to Citalopram in Turkish Patients With Major Depressive DisorderZuhal Uçkun1, Bora Başkak2, Hatice Özdemir3, Erguvan Tuğba Ozel-kızıl2, Halise Devrimci Ozguven2, Halit Sinan Süzen41Mersin University, Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Toxicology, Yenisehir Campus, TR33169, Mersin, TURKEY2Ankara University, School of Medicine, Psychiatry Department, TR06590, Dikimevi, Ankara, TURKEY 3Kirikkale University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Kirikkale, TURKEY, 4Ankara University, Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Toxicology, Tandogan, TR06100 Ankara, Turkey 4Ankara University, Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Toxicology, Tandogan, TR06100 Ankara, Turkey The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between the genetic polymorphism of the serotonin transporter gene-linked polymorphic region (5-HTTLPR)and the response to citalopram treatment and side effects in Turkish patients with major depressive disorder. The study involved 51 patients who received 10-40 mg/day of citalopram for 4 to 6 weeks. Clinical symptoms were evaluated by the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating (HAMD-17) scale, Clinical Global Impression (CGI) and UKU side effect rating scale (UKU) at weeks 4 and/or 6. The 5-HTTLPRL/S polymorphism was determined by slowdown-polymerase chain reaction method. Of the fifty-one patients, 13 (26%) were the LL genotype, 21 (41%) were the LS genotype, 17 (33%) were the SS genotype. L allele seems to be associated withbetter response due to odds ratio for L allele versus S allele despite statistically insignificant. In terms of CGI-Severity scale, The LL genotype versus the LS genotype had a higher risk at the week 6 (P<0.05).On the other hand, apart from this comparison, there is no significant difference in CGI-Severity and Improvement and UKU scales according to the distribution of genotypes at week 4 and/or 6. However, these findings surely need further investigation and confirmation. Anahtar Kelimeler: 5-HTTLPR polymorphism, Citalopram, Treatment response, Side effects.Zuhal Uçkun, Bora Başkak, Hatice Özdemir, Erguvan Tuğba Ozel-kızıl, Halise Devrimci Ozguven, Halit Sinan Süzen. Association Between The 5-HTTLPR Polymorphism and Response to Citalopram in Turkish Patients With Major Depressive Disorder. Turk J Pharm Sci. 2016; 13(2): 17-32 Corresponding Author: Halit Sinan Süzen, Türkiye |
|